On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 18:36:11 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 2:17 PM Kartik <kkartik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Introduce function kmemdup_array(), that will copy `n` number of > > elements from a given array `src` to `dst`. > > > > On success, kmemdup_array() returns 0 and copy the elements from `src` > > to newly allocated array `dst`, it also stores number of elements > > copied from `src` array to `dst_count` parameter. On failure, this > > returns a negative integer value containing the error value. > > Hmm... Why is it so complicated? > > Can it be as simple as > > return kmemdup(size_mul()); > > ? > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko The idea was to validate the arguments that are passed to kmemdup_array(). But I agree doing so complicates things here. I will update this in the next patchset. Thanks & Regards, Kartik
