On 25/07/2023 12:14, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 10/07/2023 14:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 10/07/2023 15:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:10:43PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 29/06/2023 18:01, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> With the introduction of commit 9365bf006f53 ("PCI: tegra194: Add
>>>>> interconnect support in Tegra234"), the PCI driver on Tegra194 and later
>>>>> requires an interconnect provider. However, a provider is currently only
>>>>> exposed on Tegra234 and this causes PCI on Tegra194 to defer probe
>>>>> indefinitely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix this by adding a dummy implementation on Tegra194. This allows nodes
>>>>> to be provided to interconnect consumers, but doesn't do any bandwidth
>>>>> accounting or frequency scaling.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 9365bf006f53 ("PCI: tegra194: Add interconnect support in Tegra234")
>>>>> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Applied with checkpatch warning. Please be sure you run checkpatch
>>>> before sending the patches.
>>>
>>> Are you referring to the Reported-by/Closes complaint?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> I didn't include
>>> a URL here because this came from an internal test report and there's no
>>> corresponding public reference.
>>
>> Ah, ok, apologies for pickiness then. :)
>>
>>>
>>> I suppose I could've left out the Reported-by altogether.
>>
>> I think it is fine. Checkpatch warning is just advisory.
>
>
> We need this in v6.5 as a fix, because without this change PCIe support
> is broken on Tegra194 devices. Would you be able to send as a fix for v6.5?
Thanks for letting me know. I'll send it soon.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
