Hi Krzysztof,
On 10/07/2023 14:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 10/07/2023 15:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:10:43PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 29/06/2023 18:01, Thierry Reding wrote:
From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
With the introduction of commit 9365bf006f53 ("PCI: tegra194: Add
interconnect support in Tegra234"), the PCI driver on Tegra194 and later
requires an interconnect provider. However, a provider is currently only
exposed on Tegra234 and this causes PCI on Tegra194 to defer probe
indefinitely.
Fix this by adding a dummy implementation on Tegra194. This allows nodes
to be provided to interconnect consumers, but doesn't do any bandwidth
accounting or frequency scaling.
Fixes: 9365bf006f53 ("PCI: tegra194: Add interconnect support in Tegra234")
Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied with checkpatch warning. Please be sure you run checkpatch
before sending the patches.
Are you referring to the Reported-by/Closes complaint?
Yes.
I didn't include
a URL here because this came from an internal test report and there's no
corresponding public reference.
Ah, ok, apologies for pickiness then. :)
I suppose I could've left out the Reported-by altogether.
I think it is fine. Checkpatch warning is just advisory.
We need this in v6.5 as a fix, because without this change PCIe support
is broken on Tegra194 devices. Would you be able to send as a fix for v6.5?
Thanks!
Jon
--
nvpublic
