Re: [PATCH V4 1/5] dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for Cypress cypd4226 I2C driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 16/01/2023 19:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 16/01/2023 16:50, Jon Hunter wrote:
From: Wayne Chang <waynec@xxxxxxxxxx>

add device-tree binding documentation for Cypress cypd4226 type-C
controller's I2C interface. It is a standard i2c slave with GPIO
input as IRQ interface.

Signed-off-by: Wayne Chang <waynec@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
V3 -> V4: no changes
V2 -> V3: fix additionalProperties warning on new schema
V1 -> V2: based on the review comments. Fix some addressed issues on

  .../bindings/usb/cypress,cypd4226.yaml        | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/cypress,cypd4226.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/cypress,cypd4226.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/cypress,cypd4226.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5ac28ab4e7a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/cypress,cypd4226.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/usb/cypress,cypd4226.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Cypress cypd4226 UCSI I2C Type-C Controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Wayne Chang <waynec@xxxxxxxxxx>
+
+description: |
+  The Cypress cypd4226 UCSI I2C type-C controller is a I2C interface type-C
+  controller.
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: cypress,cypd4226
+
+  '#address-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  '#size-cells':
+    const: 0
+
+  reg:
+    const: 0x08
+
+  interrupts:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  cypress,firmware-build:
+    enum:
+      - nv
+      - gn
+    description: |
+      the name of the CCGx firmware built for product series.
+      should be set one of following:
+      - "nv" for the RTX product series
+      - "gn" for the Jetson product series

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.


Thanks. Apologies for this. I will sort this out in the next revision.

Jon

--
nvpublic



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux