Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] thermal/core: Rename trips to ntrips

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 09:24 +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> 
> On 7/3/22 19:30, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > In order to use thermal trips defined in the thermal structure,
> > rename
> > the 'trips' field to 'ntrips' to have the 'trips' field containing
> > the
> > thermal trip points.
> > 
> > Cc: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc; Eduardo Valentin <eduval@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/thermal/gov_fair_share.c        |  6 +++---
> >   drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c   |  4 ++--
> >   drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c |  2 +-
> >   drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c          | 20 ++++++++++----------
> >   drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c       |  4 ++--
> >   drivers/thermal/thermal_netlink.c       |  2 +-
> >   drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c         | 22 +++++++++++---------
> > --
> >   include/linux/thermal.h                 |  2 +-
> >   8 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> > index 6289b0bb1c97..3a57878a2a6c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> 
> Missing updated ne name in comment here:
>   * @trips:      number of trip points the thermal zone supports
> 
> 
> > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ struct thermal_zone_device {
> >   	struct thermal_attr *trip_hyst_attrs;
> >   	enum thermal_device_mode mode;
> >   	void *devdata;
> > -	int trips;
> > +	int ntrips;
> >   	unsigned long trips_disabled;	/* bitmap for disabled
> > trips */
> >   	unsigned long passive_delay_jiffies;
> >   	unsigned long polling_delay_jiffies;
> 
> Maybe this is only my bias, but this new name 'ntrips' looks
> like negation in electronics.
> 
> We have examples like: num_cpus, num_pins, num_leds, num_groups,
> num_locks, num_buffers, num_phys, etc...
> 
> Could we have 'num_trips' and follow to this convention here as well?
> 
I'd vote for "num_trips". :)

-rui




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux