On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 06:28:36PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 10.12.2021 16:43, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 11:34:39PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 09.12.2021 20:33, Thierry Reding пишет:
> >>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> The Tegra memory controller provides reset controls for hotflush reset,
> >>> so the #reset-cells property must be specified.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi | 1 +
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi
> >>> index 328425dba023..ce7410ee08b8 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi
> >>> @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ mc: memory-controller@70019000 {
> >>>
> >>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >>>
> >>> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> >>> #iommu-cells = <1>;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> This will conflict with the patch that adds video decoder node [1].
> >> Since the VDE patch was sent out earlier, I suggest you to drop this patch.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/patch/20211208173609.4064-23-digetx@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > I prefer to keep this separate because it actually gives the reason for
> > why this is added, whereas with the VDE node patch it looks like it's
> > there by mistake.
>
> So the direct reference to the MC using TEGRA114_MC_RESET_VDE is a
> mistake to you. I disagree.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that it's not obvious from the
patch description or from the rest of the content why that #reset-cells
is added. It looks out of place.
> I don't mind if you'll keep this patch, but then please don't forget to
> resolve the conflict, or we may have two #reset-cells entries.
Yeah, no worries, I'll take care of that.
Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
