23.03.2021 17:43, Mikko Perttunen пишет: >> >> FWIW, I would've been fine with stashing all of this into drm.c as well >> since the rest of the UAPI is in that already. The churn in this patch >> is reasonably small, but it would've been even less if this was just all >> in drm.c. > > I think we shouldn't have the uapi in drm.c -- it just makes the file a > bit of a dumping ground. I think drm.c should have the code that relates > to initialization and initial registration with DRM. +1 drm.c is already very unmanageable / difficult to follow, it absolutely must be split up.
