19.01.2021 20:24, Thierry Reding пишет: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:50:31PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> PLLC and PLLM are usually disabled on system suspend because all devices >> which use these PLLs are either suspended or switched away to other clock >> source. Don't enable unused PLLs on resume from suspend by keeping track >> of the enable-state of the PLLs across suspend-resume. >> >> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@xxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra20.S | 38 ++++++++++-- >> arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > For future patches with this many tested-bys, can you collect a bit of > information about where these were tested? That'd be a good way to get a > better understanding of the coverage and a good way to collect a bit of > information about what devices are being used. > > I've seen a pattern like this used sometimes: > > Tested-by: Name <email> # Board that was tested on > > So perhaps we can adopt this for these cases? > > Applied, thanks. Okay, for this patch it should be: Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@xxxxxxxxx> # T30 Ouya Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> # T20 PAZ00 and T124 TK1 Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # T30 Ouya Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> # T20 A500 and T30 Nexus7
