On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:50:31PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > PLLC and PLLM are usually disabled on system suspend because all devices > which use these PLLs are either suspended or switched away to other clock > source. Don't enable unused PLLs on resume from suspend by keeping track > of the enable-state of the PLLs across suspend-resume. > > Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra20.S | 38 ++++++++++-- > arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) For future patches with this many tested-bys, can you collect a bit of information about where these were tested? That'd be a good way to get a better understanding of the coverage and a good way to collect a bit of information about what devices are being used. I've seen a pattern like this used sometimes: Tested-by: Name <email> # Board that was tested on So perhaps we can adopt this for these cases? Applied, thanks. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
