On 9/23/20 9:23 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 21.09.2020 00:37, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>> 18.09.2020 12:23, Chanwoo Choi пишет:
>> ...
>>>> Hence if we want to improve the code, I think we can make this change:
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>>>> b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>>>> index ee274daa57ac..4e3ac23e6850 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>>>> @@ -891,8 +891,6 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct
>>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>> return err;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - reset_control_assert(tegra->reset);
>>>> -
>>>> err = clk_prepare_enable(tegra->clock);
>>>> if (err) {
>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>>>> @@ -900,7 +898,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct
>>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>> return err;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - reset_control_deassert(tegra->reset);
>>>> + reset_control_reset(tegra->reset);
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < mc->num_timings; i++) {
>>>> /*
>>>
>>> It looks good to me for improving the readability
>>> for everyone who don't know the detailed h/w information.
>>
>> Okay, I'll make a patch sometime soon.
>
> Chanwoo, I want to clarify that the Dan's v1 patch is still good to me
> and should be applied. I'll improve the readability on top of the Dan's
> change.
>
>
OK. Applied it. Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
