18.09.2020 12:23, Chanwoo Choi пишет:
...
>> Hence if we want to improve the code, I think we can make this change:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>> b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>> index ee274daa57ac..4e3ac23e6850 100644
>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
>> @@ -891,8 +891,6 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> - reset_control_assert(tegra->reset);
>> -
>> err = clk_prepare_enable(tegra->clock);
>> if (err) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> @@ -900,7 +898,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> - reset_control_deassert(tegra->reset);
>> + reset_control_reset(tegra->reset);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < mc->num_timings; i++) {
>> /*
>
> It looks good to me for improving the readability
> for everyone who don't know the detailed h/w information.
Okay, I'll make a patch sometime soon.
