On 24/07/20 1:58 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 01:44:27PM +0530, Rohit Bharadwaj wrote:
>> On 24/07/20 10:06 am, Rohit K Bharadwaj wrote:
>>> changed usage of slave (deprecated) to secondary
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rohit K Bharadwaj <bharadwaj.rohit8@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> v3: change patch subject, add version history
>>> v2: add changelog text in body of mail
>>> v1: fix style issues by changing usage of slave to secondary
>>>
>>> drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 12 ++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
>>> index 360ec0407740..5d7b66719a39 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
>>> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void tegra_init_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>>> +static void tegra_init_i2c_secondary(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>>> {
>>> u32 val;
>>>
>>> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static void tegra_init_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>>> }
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>> -static void nvec_disable_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>>> +static void nvec_disable_i2c_secondary(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>>> {
>>> disable_irq(nvec->irq);
>>> writel(I2C_SL_NEWSL | I2C_SL_NACK, nvec->base + I2C_SL_CNFG);
>>> @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static int tegra_nvec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nvec);
>>> nvec->dev = dev;
>>>
>>> - if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "slave-addr", &nvec->i2c_addr)) {
>>> + if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "secondary-addr", &nvec->i2c_addr)) {
>>> dev_err(dev, "no i2c address specified");
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> }
>>> @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int tegra_nvec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> }
>>> disable_irq(nvec->irq);
>>>
>>> - tegra_init_i2c_slave(nvec);
>>> + tegra_init_i2c_secondary(nvec);
>>>
>>> /* enable event reporting */
>>> nvec_toggle_global_events(nvec, true);
>>> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int nvec_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>> if (!err)
>>> nvec_msg_free(nvec, msg);
>>>
>>> - nvec_disable_i2c_slave(nvec);
>>> + nvec_disable_i2c_secondary(nvec);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static int nvec_resume(struct device *dev)
>>> struct nvec_chip *nvec = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>
>>> dev_dbg(nvec->dev, "resuming\n");
>>> - tegra_init_i2c_slave(nvec);
>>> + tegra_init_i2c_secondary(nvec);
>>> nvec_toggle_global_events(nvec, true);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>>
>> Dear All, this message was not delivered to marvin24@xxxxxx, I'm getting that The response from the remote server was:
>> 554 gmx.net (mxgmx016) Nemesis ESMTP Service not available No SMTP service Reject due to policy restrictions,
>
> Not a big deal, email address atrophy over time. That's why you always
> cc: a public mailing list for patches.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Thank you so much for the reply sir, I hope this patch gets accepted.
