On 24/07/20 10:06 am, Rohit K Bharadwaj wrote:
> changed usage of slave (deprecated) to secondary
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit K Bharadwaj <bharadwaj.rohit8@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3: change patch subject, add version history
> v2: add changelog text in body of mail
> v1: fix style issues by changing usage of slave to secondary
>
> drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> index 360ec0407740..5d7b66719a39 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static void tegra_init_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
> +static void tegra_init_i2c_secondary(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
> {
> u32 val;
>
> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static void tegra_init_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> -static void nvec_disable_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
> +static void nvec_disable_i2c_secondary(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
> {
> disable_irq(nvec->irq);
> writel(I2C_SL_NEWSL | I2C_SL_NACK, nvec->base + I2C_SL_CNFG);
> @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static int tegra_nvec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nvec);
> nvec->dev = dev;
>
> - if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "slave-addr", &nvec->i2c_addr)) {
> + if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "secondary-addr", &nvec->i2c_addr)) {
> dev_err(dev, "no i2c address specified");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int tegra_nvec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> disable_irq(nvec->irq);
>
> - tegra_init_i2c_slave(nvec);
> + tegra_init_i2c_secondary(nvec);
>
> /* enable event reporting */
> nvec_toggle_global_events(nvec, true);
> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int nvec_suspend(struct device *dev)
> if (!err)
> nvec_msg_free(nvec, msg);
>
> - nvec_disable_i2c_slave(nvec);
> + nvec_disable_i2c_secondary(nvec);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static int nvec_resume(struct device *dev)
> struct nvec_chip *nvec = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> dev_dbg(nvec->dev, "resuming\n");
> - tegra_init_i2c_slave(nvec);
> + tegra_init_i2c_secondary(nvec);
> nvec_toggle_global_events(nvec, true);
>
> return 0;
>
Dear All, this message was not delivered to marvin24@xxxxxx, I'm getting that The response from the remote server was:
554 gmx.net (mxgmx016) Nemesis ESMTP Service not available No SMTP service Reject due to policy restrictions,
I'm really sorry if I'm wasting your time by these trivial problems, thanks a lot for your time, could you please let me know whether I have to resend the patch again or is the patch fine currently and can be accepted into the linux kernel tree?
