17.07.2020 23:23, Arnd Bergmann пишет: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:13 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 17.07.2020 22:24, Arnd Bergmann пишет: >>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 6:13 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> ARM: tegra: Default configuration changes for v5.9-rc1 >>>> >>>> Enables a few new configuration options that are useful on the new Nexus >>>> 7 and Acer A500 devices, as well as the userspace CPU frequency governor >>>> that's mainly used for testing. >>> >>> I've pulled all the other branches, but I'm a little bit wary about >>> this one since >>> Dmitry's patch enables a number of options that would increase the kernel >>> size, and I see no indication that it has been reviewed by anyone else. >>> >>> I think the changes all make sense, but I would prefer to have a wider >>> audience for that patch and get some Acks. If you like, you can send the >>> tegra specific changes in a new pull request in the meantime, and then >>> send the remaining additions to the usual suspects as an RFC, with >>> Cc:soc@xxxxxxxxxx, so I can apply it later if everyone is happy enough >>> with it. >> >> Hello, Arnd! >> >> But these are already the tegra specific changes. The patch changes >> tegra_defconfig and not the multi_v7_defconfig. >> >> Could you please clarify from whom would you expect to get more Acks if >> not from the tegra maintainers? >> >> In practice nobody uses upstream defconfig as-is, it's only used as >> initial template. So I'm not sure why tegra-kernel size makes you to >> worry. Could you please explain? > > It was a mistake on my end, for some reason I thought you were > changing the arm64 defconfig, which does not have per-platform > files. > > The patch is good, and I'll pull the branch as soon as I get to it > (it's a bit late for today). Awesome, thank you!
