29.06.2020 13:27, Mikko Perttunen пишет: ... >> We don't need a dedicated sync point FD for all kinds of jobs, don't we? >> For example, I don't see why a sync point FD may be needed in a case of >> Opentegra jobs. > > I think it's cleaner if we have just one way to allocate syncpoints, and > then those syncpoints can be passed to different things depending on the > situation. > > If we want to protect direct incrementing while a job is submitted, we > could have a locking API where an ongoing job can take a lock refcount > in the syncpoint, and incrementing would return -EBUSY. Okay, let's go with this for now.
