24.06.2019 2:50, Chanwoo Choi пишет: > Hi Dmitry, > > On 19. 6. 24. 오전 2:17, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> 05.06.2019 2:09, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: >>> 04.06.2019 3:49, Chanwoo Choi пишет: >>>> On 19. 6. 4. 오전 1:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>>>> 03.05.2019 3:52, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: >>>>>> 03.05.2019 3:31, Chanwoo Choi пишет: >>>>>>> Hi Dmitry, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 19. 5. 2. 오전 8:37, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>>>>>>> Changelog: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> v4: Addressed all review comments that were made by Chanwoo Choi to v3: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - changed the driver removal order to match the probe exactly >>>>>>>> - added clarifying comment for 1/8 ratio to the Tegra20 driver >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chanwoo, please also note that the clk patch that should fix >>>>>>>> compilation problem that was reported the kbuild-test-robot is already >>>>>>>> applied and available in the recent linux-next. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I knew that Stephen picked up your path about clock. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Chanwoo, >>>>>> >>>>>> Okay, good. Thank you very much for reviewing this series! I assume it's >>>>>> too late now for v5.2, but it should be good to go for v5.3. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hello Chanwoo, >>>>> >>>>> Will be nice to see the patches in the linux-next before they'll hit mainline. We have tested that >>>>> everything works fine on a selective devices, but won't hurt to get some extra testing beforehand. >>>>> AFAIK, at least NVIDIA people are regularly testing -next on theirs dev boards. Please note that >>>>> this not very important, so don't bother if there is some hurdle with pushing to the tracking branch >>>>> for now. Also please let me know if you're expecting to see some ACK's on the patches, I'm sure >>>>> we'll be able to work out that with Thierry and Jon if necessary. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Dmitry, >>>> I think that it is enough for applying to mainline branch. >>>> The devfreq.git is maintained by Myungjoo. He will be merged or >>>> reviewed if there are th remained review point. >>> >>> Thank you very much! >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Myungjoo, >>>> I reviewed the Dmitry's patches from v1 to v4 patches. >>>> And then I tested them on my testing branch[1] for catching >>>> the build warning and error. In result, it is clean. >>>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing >>>> >>>> Please review or apply these patches for v5.3. >>>> >>> >>> Hello Myungjoo, >>> >>> I think this patchset should be completed now. Thierry has some extra >>> comments to the patches, but seems nothing critical so far and all the >>> concerns could be addressed in a follow-up series. Please let me know if >>> you're fine with this, I can re-spin v5 as well if necessary. >>> >> >> Hello Chanwoo, >> >> It looks like Myungjoo is inactive at the moment. Do you know if he'll >> be back to the time of the merge window opening or you'll be curating >> the pull request for 5.3 this time? > > Myungoo works in the same place. I'll talk with him. > >> >> Secondly, I'll send a few more patches on top of this series, addressing >> Thierry's comments and making more improvements. Please let me know if >> this causes any problems and I should re-spin the whole series. > > OK. I'll review them. Thank you!