04.06.2019 3:49, Chanwoo Choi пишет: > On 19. 6. 4. 오전 1:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> 03.05.2019 3:52, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: >>> 03.05.2019 3:31, Chanwoo Choi пишет: >>>> Hi Dmitry, >>>> >>>> On 19. 5. 2. 오전 8:37, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>>>> Changelog: >>>>> >>>>> v4: Addressed all review comments that were made by Chanwoo Choi to v3: >>>>> >>>>> - changed the driver removal order to match the probe exactly >>>>> - added clarifying comment for 1/8 ratio to the Tegra20 driver >>>>> >>>>> Chanwoo, please also note that the clk patch that should fix >>>>> compilation problem that was reported the kbuild-test-robot is already >>>>> applied and available in the recent linux-next. >>>> >>>> I knew that Stephen picked up your path about clock. >>> >>> Hi Chanwoo, >>> >>> Okay, good. Thank you very much for reviewing this series! I assume it's >>> too late now for v5.2, but it should be good to go for v5.3. >>> >> >> Hello Chanwoo, >> >> Will be nice to see the patches in the linux-next before they'll hit mainline. We have tested that >> everything works fine on a selective devices, but won't hurt to get some extra testing beforehand. >> AFAIK, at least NVIDIA people are regularly testing -next on theirs dev boards. Please note that >> this not very important, so don't bother if there is some hurdle with pushing to the tracking branch >> for now. Also please let me know if you're expecting to see some ACK's on the patches, I'm sure >> we'll be able to work out that with Thierry and Jon if necessary. >> >> > > Hi Dmitry, > I think that it is enough for applying to mainline branch. > The devfreq.git is maintained by Myungjoo. He will be merged or > reviewed if there are th remained review point. Thank you very much! > > Hi Myungjoo, > I reviewed the Dmitry's patches from v1 to v4 patches. > And then I tested them on my testing branch[1] for catching > the build warning and error. In result, it is clean. > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing > > Please review or apply these patches for v5.3. > Hello Myungjoo, I think this patchset should be completed now. Thierry has some extra comments to the patches, but seems nothing critical so far and all the concerns could be addressed in a follow-up series. Please let me know if you're fine with this, I can re-spin v5 as well if necessary.
