17.06.2019 21:41, Bitan Biswas пишет: > > > On 6/17/19 5:13 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> 17.06.2019 8:09, Bitan Biswas пишет: >>> Remove BUG, BUG_ON as it makes system usable: >>> - Remove redundant BUG_ON calls or replace with WARN_ON_ONCE >>> as needed. >>> - Remove BUG() and mask Rx interrupt similar as Tx >>> for message fully sent case. >>> - Add caller error handling and WARN_ON_ONCE check for non-zero >>> rx_fifo_avail in tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo() after all processing. >> >> The commit message should describe motivation of the change and not the change itself, >> unless it's some additional information which is required for better understanding of >> the code. >> >> In yours case it could be something like that: >> >> The usage of BUG() macro is generally discouraged in kernel, unless >> it's a problem that results in a physical damage or loss of data. >> This patch removes unnecessary BUG() macros and replaces the rest >> with a warnings. > I shall update as per above comments. > >> >>> Signed-off-by: Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- >>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c >>> index 4dfb4c1..b155b61 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c >>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c >>> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ >>> #define I2C_ERR_NO_ACK BIT(0) >>> #define I2C_ERR_ARBITRATION_LOST BIT(1) >>> #define I2C_ERR_UNKNOWN_INTERRUPT BIT(2) >>> +#define I2C_ERR_RX_BUFFER_OVERFLOW BIT(3) >>> #define PACKET_HEADER0_HEADER_SIZE_SHIFT 28 >>> #define PACKET_HEADER0_PACKET_ID_SHIFT 16 >>> @@ -515,7 +516,11 @@ static int tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev) >>> * prevent overwriting past the end of buf >>> */ >>> if (rx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0) { >>> - BUG_ON(buf_remaining > 3); >>> + /* >>> + * buf_remaining > 3 check not needed as rx_fifo_avail == 0 >>> + * when (words_to_transfer was > rx_fifo_avail) earlier >>> + * in this function. >>> + */ >>> val = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_RX_FIFO); >>> val = cpu_to_le32(val); >>> memcpy(buf, &val, buf_remaining); >>> @@ -523,7 +528,15 @@ static int tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev) >>> rx_fifo_avail--; >>> } >>> - BUG_ON(rx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0); >>> + if ((!(i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining)) && >> >> The RX FIFO shall be drained completely no matter what. >> >> Hence why the "i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining" checking is needed here? > I moved the part of below condition in Patch V6 to function tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo: > >>> + err_val = tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(i2c_dev); >>> + if ((!(i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining)) && > >> Let's move this check into tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo() and return -EINVAL for that case. >> This will make code to look cleaner. > > Is above condition not needed? Let's put it at the very beginning. This may give a bit more information about the problem by knowing if the offending overflow happens after or during of the buffer's fill up. static int tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev) { u32 val; int rx_fifo_avail; u8 *buf = i2c_dev->msg_buf; size_t buf_remaining = i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining; int words_to_transfer; if (WARN_ON(!i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining)) return -EINVAL; ... In general, the original logic should be preserved during of refactoring. In this case we are keeping the original check and then also making it a bit more informative. > >> >> Secondly, in the future please don't add parens where they are not needed. In this >> case parens around !i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining are not needed at all. >> > I shall look out for similar unnecessary parentheses and update the patch. Yes, please clean up all the occurrences in the code if there are any. And please do it in a separate patch.