On 6/13/2019 3:12 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 13/06/2019 10:10, Sameer Pujar wrote:
Add DT nodes for following devices on Tegra186 and Tegra194
* ACONNECT
* ADMA
* AGIC
Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
changes in current revision
* use single address range for all APE modules
* fix address range for agic
arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
index 426ac0b..b4d735e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
@@ -1295,4 +1295,71 @@
(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
};
+
+ aconnect@2a41000 {
This address does not look correct. This appears to be the address of
the AGIC. I think it should be 2900000, however, I also wonder if we
should even bother with an address for the aconnect as this is just a
bus and we don't specific a 'reg' property.
Do you mean, should be ok to just mention "aconnect {"?
+ compatible = "nvidia,tegra210-aconnect";
+ clocks = <&bpmp TEGRA186_CLK_APE>,
+ <&bpmp TEGRA186_CLK_APB2APE>;
+ clock-names = "ape", "apb2ape";
+ power-domains = <&bpmp TEGRA186_POWER_DOMAIN_AUD>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges = <0x02900000 0x0 0x02900000 0x1FFFFF>;
This should be 0x1fffff.
done
+ status = "disabled";
+
+ dma-controller@2930000 {
+ compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-adma";
+ reg = <0x02930000 0x50000>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&agic>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 15 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 18 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 19 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 20 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ #dma-cells = <1>;
+ clocks = <&bpmp TEGRA186_CLK_AHUB>;
+ clock-names = "d_audio";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
+ agic: agic@2a41000 {
I think that this should also be "agic: interrupt-controller@xxxx" to
conform with standard names. Sorry the Tegra210 version is not the best
reference!
will change
Cheers
Jon
