On 18/02/2019 10:01, Joseph Lo wrote:
> On 2/15/19 11:14 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 01/02/2019 17:16, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>> Add support for the Tegra210 timer that runs at oscillator clock
>>> (TMR10-TMR13). We need these timers to work as clock event device and to
>>> replace the ARMv8 architected timer due to it can't survive across the
>>> power cycle of the CPU core or CPUPORESET signal. So it can't be a
>>> wake-up
>>> source when CPU suspends in power down state.
>>>
>>> Also convert the original driver to use timer-of API.
>>>
>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> v6:
>>> * refine the timer defines
>>> * add ack tag from Jon.
>>> v5:
>>> * add ack tag from Thierry
>>> v4:
>>> * merge timer-tegra210.c in previous version into timer-tegra20.c
>>> v3:
>>> * use timer-of API
>>> v2:
>>> * add error clean-up code
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>> drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra20.c | 371 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>> index a9e26f6a81a1..6af78534a285 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ config SUN5I_HSTIMER
>>> config TEGRA_TIMER
>>> bool "Tegra timer driver" if COMPILE_TEST
>>> select CLKSRC_MMIO
>>> - depends on ARM
>>
>> This will break because the delay functions are defined in
>> arch/arm/include/asm/delay.h and the 01.org will try to compile the
>> driver on x86.
>>
>> You may want to add 'depends on ARM && ARM64'
>>
>
> OK, I think it's 'depends on ARM || ARM64'.
Ah, yes right.
> Will fix.
>
>>> + select TIMER_OF
>>> help
>>> Enables support for the Tegra driver.
>>>
> [snip]
>>> -
>>> static struct timespec64 persistent_ts;
>>> static u64 persistent_ms, last_persistent_ms;
>>
>> Did you check the above changes are still relevant after commit
>> 39232ed5a1793f67 and after doing a change similar to
>> commit 1569557549697207e523 ?
>>
>
> Yes, just check both commits. I think it's okay to use the same. But
> need another patch to do that, this patch only adds new support for
> Tegra210. Doesn't touch the original code.
Ok, let's do the change later.
>>> static struct delay_timer tegra_delay_timer;
> [snip]
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct timer_of, tegra_to) = {
>>> + .flags = TIMER_OF_CLOCK | TIMER_OF_BASE,
>>> +
>>> + .clkevt = {
>>> + .name = "tegra_timer",
>>> + .rating = 460,
>>> + .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT,
>>
>> CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ ?
> Yes, good catch.
>>
>>> + .set_next_event = tegra_timer_set_next_event,
>>> + .set_state_shutdown = tegra_timer_shutdown,
>>> + .set_state_periodic = tegra_timer_set_periodic,
>>> + .set_state_oneshot = tegra_timer_shutdown,
>>> + .tick_resume = tegra_timer_shutdown,
>>> + },
>>> +};
> [snip]
>>> -static unsigned long tegra_delay_timer_read_counter_long(void)
>>> +static int tegra_timer_suspend(void)
>>> {
>>> - return readl(timer_reg_base + TIMERUS_CNTR_1US);
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>>
>> Please do not add those #ifdef but function stubs.
>>
>>> + int cpu;
>>> +
>>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>> + struct timer_of *to = per_cpu_ptr(&tegra_to, cpu);
>>> + void __iomem *reg_base = timer_of_base(to);
>>> +
>>> + writel(TIMER_PCR_INTR_CLR, reg_base + TIMER_PCR);
>>> + }
>>> +#else
>>> + void __iomem *reg_base = timer_of_base(&tegra_to);
>>> +
>>> + writel(TIMER_PCR_INTR_CLR, reg_base + TIMER_PCR);
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>> -static irqreturn_t tegra_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>> +static void tegra_timer_resume(void)
>>> {
>>> - struct clock_event_device *evt = (struct clock_event_device
>>> *)dev_id;
>>> - timer_writel(1<<30, TIMER3_BASE + TIMER_PCR);
>>> - evt->event_handler(evt);
>>> - return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> + writel(usec_config, timer_reg_base + TIMERUS_USEC_CFG);
>>> }
>>> -static struct irqaction tegra_timer_irq = {
>>> - .name = "timer0",
>>> - .flags = IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
>>> - .handler = tegra_timer_interrupt,
>>> - .dev_id = &tegra_clockevent,
>>> +static struct syscore_ops tegra_timer_syscore_ops = {
>>> + .suspend = tegra_timer_suspend,
>>> + .resume = tegra_timer_resume,
>>> };
>>
>> It will be nicer to use the suspend/resume callbacks defined in the
>> clockevent structure, so you can use generic as there are multiple
>> clockevents defined for the tegra210, thus multiple timer-of
>> encapsulating them. When the suspend/resume callbacks are called, they
>> have the clock_event pointer and you can use it to retrieve the timer-of
>> and then the base address. At the end, the callbacks will end up the
>> same for tegra20 and tegra210.
>>
>
> Very good suggestion, will follow up.
>
>>> -static int __init tegra20_init_timer(struct device_node *np)
>>> +static int tegra_timer_init(struct device_node *np, struct timer_of
>>> *to)
> [snip]
>>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>> + struct timer_of *cpu_to;
>>> +
>>> + cpu_to = per_cpu_ptr(&tegra_to, cpu);
>>> + cpu_to->of_base.base = timer_reg_base +
>>> TIMER_BASE_FOR_CPU(cpu);
>>> + cpu_to->of_clk.rate = timer_of_rate(to);
>>> + cpu_to->clkevt.cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
>>> +
>>> + cpu_to->clkevt.irq =
>>> + irq_of_parse_and_map(np, IRQ_IDX_FOR_CPU(cpu));
>>> + if (!cpu_to->clkevt.irq) {
>>> + pr_err("%s: can't map IRQ for CPU%d\n",
>>> + __func__, cpu);
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + irq_set_status_flags(cpu_to->clkevt.irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
>>> + ret = request_irq(cpu_to->clkevt.irq, tegra_timer_isr,
>>> + IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_NOBALANCING,
>>> + cpu_to->clkevt.name, &cpu_to->clkevt);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + pr_err("%s: cannot setup irq %d for CPU%d\n",
>>> + __func__, cpu_to->clkevt.irq, cpu);
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto out_irq;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>
>> You should configure the timer in the tegra_timer_setup() function
>> instead of using this cpu loop.
>>
>
> I think I still need to leave 'irq_of_parse_and_map' and 'request_irq'
> here. Is that ok?
Perhaps you can store the np pointer in the private data structure of
timer-of and let the timer_of API to retrieve the irq in the cpuhp
callbacks.
irq_of_parse_and_map will be called by timer-of.
I'm not sure irq_set_status_flags really operates on the irq because it
is called after request_irq.
>>> +
>>> + cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_TEGRA_TIMER_STARTING,
>>> + "AP_TEGRA_TIMER_STARTING", tegra_timer_setup,
>>> + tegra_timer_stop);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> +out_irq:
>>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>> + struct timer_of *cpu_to;
>>> +
>>> + cpu_to = per_cpu_ptr(&tegra_to, cpu);
>>> + if (cpu_to->clkevt.irq) {
>>> + free_irq(cpu_to->clkevt.irq, &cpu_to->clkevt);
>>> + irq_dispose_mapping(cpu_to->clkevt.irq);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> +out:
>>> + timer_of_cleanup(to);
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +TIMER_OF_DECLARE(tegra210_timer, "nvidia,tegra210-timer",
>>> tegra210_timer_init);
>>> +#else /* CONFIG_ARM */
>>
>> Don't use the macro to select one or another. Just define the functions
>> and let the init postcalls to free the memory.
>>
>
> Okay, I think I can move 'TIMER_OF_DECLARE' out of the ifdef. They will
> be something like below. And change tegraxxx_init_timer to
> tegra_init_timer.
>
> TIMER_OF_DECLARE(tegra210_timer, "nvidia,tegra210-timer",
> tegra_timer_init);
> TIMER_OF_DECLARE(tegra20_timer, "nvidia,tegra20-timer", tegra_timer_init);
>
> Is that ok?
Yes, it is fine.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
