On 24 August 2018 at 11:11, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 09:13:57PM +0300, Aapo Vienamo wrote: >> Hi all, >> This series implements support for HS400 signaling on Tegra210 and >> Tegra186. This includes programming the DQS trimmer values, implementing >> enhanced strobe and HS400 delay line calibration. >> >> This series depends on the "Tegra SDHCI add support for HS200 and UHS >> signaling" series. >> >> Changelog: >> v2: >> - Document in dt-bindings which controllers support HS400 >> - Use val instead of reg in tegra_sdhci_set_dqs_trim() >> - Change "dt" to "DT" in "mmc: tegra: Parse and program DQS trim >> value" commit message >> - Add spaces around << in tegra_sdhci_set_dqs_trim() >> - Make the "mmc: tegra: Implement HS400 enhanced strobe" commit >> message more detailed >> - Remove a debug print from tegra_sdhci_hs400_enhanced_strobe() >> - Add blank lines around if-else-block in >> tegra_sdhci_hs400_enhanced_strobe() >> - Use val instead of reg in tegra_sdhci_hs400_enhanced_strobe() >> - Make commit message of "mmc: tegra: Implement HS400 delay line >> calibration" more detailed >> >> Aapo Vienamo (8): >> dt-bindings: mmc: Add DQS trim value to Tegra SDHCI >> mmc: tegra: Parse and program DQS trim value >> mmc: tegra: Implement HS400 enhanced strobe >> mmc: tegra: Implement HS400 delay line calibration >> arm64: dts: tegra186: Add SDMMC4 DQS trim value >> arm64: dts: tegra210: Add SDMMC4 DQS trim value >> arm64: dts: tegra186: Enable HS400 >> arm64: dts: tegra210: Enable HS400 >> >> .../bindings/mmc/nvidia,tegra20-sdhci.txt | 4 ++ >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi | 2 + >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi | 2 + >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++- >> 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Ulf, Adrian, > > Aapo just reminded me of this small series that also has a dependency on > the UHS signalling series posted earlier. I think it's easiest if I just > stash this on top of the existing branch that I have and send this along > with the rest as part of a pull request early after v4.19-rc1. Yep, that would be convenient for me. Although, we first need some input from Adrian. Kind regards Uffe
