Re: [PATCH V3 01/12] PCI: tegra: Start LTSSM after programming root port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:57:24AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:57:28AM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 14-Dec-17 12:04 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:02:02PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 13-Dec-17 7:38 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:20:39PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 12-Dec-17 5:02 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 07:27:12PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> > >>>>>> This patch ensures that LTSSM is started (by deasserting pcie_xrst) only
> > >>>>>> after all the required root port register programming is completed.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>>> ---
> > >>>>>> V3:
> > >>>>>> * no change in this patch
> > >>>>>> V2:
> > >>>>>> * no change in this patch
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>  drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 9 +++++----
> > >>>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> > >>>>>> index 96e8038c3019..b41c60c7414c 100644
> > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> > >>>>>> @@ -1024,9 +1024,6 @@ static int tegra_pcie_enable_controller(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> > >>>>>>  		}
> > >>>>>>  	}
> > >>>>>>  
> > >>>>>> -	/* take the PCIe interface module out of reset */
> > >>>>>> -	reset_control_deassert(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> > >>>>>> -
> > >>>>>>  	/* finally enable PCIe */
> > >>>>>>  	value = afi_readl(pcie, AFI_CONFIGURATION);
> > >>>>>>  	value |= AFI_CONFIGURATION_EN_FPCI;
> > >>>>>> @@ -1065,7 +1062,6 @@ static void tegra_pcie_power_off(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> > >>>>>>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to power off PHY(s): %d\n", err);
> > >>>>>>  	}
> > >>>>>>  
> > >>>>>> -	reset_control_assert(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This does not look like it is part of the reset de-assertion code move.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> tegra_pcie_enable_controller() -> tegra_pcie_enable_ports()
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> in other words, why are you removing it ?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Lorenzo
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi Lorenzo,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Host driver should start LTSSM after programming all controller registers.
> > >>>> In tegra_pcie_enable_controller() bunch of AFI module programming is done and
> > >>>> I am adding PCIe register programming in this series.
> > >>>> So I moved deasserting of pcie_xrst(which starts LTSSM) to tegra_pcie_enable_ports(),
> > >>>> which is right after sending RST pulse(tegra_pcie_port_reset()) to endpoint.
> > >>>
> > >>> I asked why you removed the reset assertion in tegra_pcie_power_off(),
> > >>> it is not clear to me. You still call tegra_pcie_power_off() in
> > >>> the tegra_pcie_probe() error path and I see no reason why the reset
> > >>> assertion - called through:
> > >>>
> > >>> tegra_pcie_put_resources()
> > >>> 	-> tegra_pcie_power_of()
> > >>> 	
> > >>> is removed, if it was needed previously.
> > >>>
> > >>> Lorenzo
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> New sequence with this patch will be
> > >> tegra_pcie_enable_controller() -> tegra_pcie_request_resources() -> tegra_pcie_enable_ports()
> > >>                                    ->goto put_resources on fail        -> reset_control_deassert(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> > >>
> > >> Since pcie_xrst deassert happens after tegra_pcie_request_resources(), there is no need to assert pcie_xrst on put_resource failure.
> > > 
> > > I do not understand you, sorry for being blunt.
> > > 
> > > What has tegra_pcie_request_resources() to do with the reset
> > > assertion/deassertion ?
> > > 
> > > This patch moves:
> > > 
> > > reset_control_deassert(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> > > 
> > > from:
> > > 
> > > tegra_pcie_enable_controller()
> > > 
> > > to
> > > 
> > > tegra_pcie_enable_ports()
> > > 
> > > if:
> > > 
> > > reset_control_assert(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> > > 
> > > was needed before this patch in tegra_pcie_power_off()
> > > 
> > > why it is not needed there after this patch is applied ?
> > > 
> > > Lorenzo
> > > 
> > Opposite of tegra_pcie_enable_ports() is missing on disable_msi
> > failure in current driver. So I took care of assert pcie_xrst
> > in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846043/ along with other
> > resources.
> 
> Which is in another series. This patch has to be self-contained with a
> single logical change that is applicable on its own. Even if we end up
> merging the series above every patch has to make sense on its own. This
> does not.
> 
> So I would start with re-posting this series as a self contained one,
> addressing all review comments; we will get to other series later when
> this is sorted.

Hi Manikanta,

I wanted to check with you where are we with this series. I would mark
it with "Changes requested", waiting for you to rebase it and update it
according to review comments.

Please let me know if that's OK with you.

Thanks,
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux