On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:20:39PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
>
>
> On 12-Dec-17 5:02 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 07:27:12PM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> >> This patch ensures that LTSSM is started (by deasserting pcie_xrst) only
> >> after all the required root port register programming is completed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> V3:
> >> * no change in this patch
> >> V2:
> >> * no change in this patch
> >>
> >> drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 9 +++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> >> index 96e8038c3019..b41c60c7414c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> >> @@ -1024,9 +1024,6 @@ static int tegra_pcie_enable_controller(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> - /* take the PCIe interface module out of reset */
> >> - reset_control_deassert(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> >> -
> >> /* finally enable PCIe */
> >> value = afi_readl(pcie, AFI_CONFIGURATION);
> >> value |= AFI_CONFIGURATION_EN_FPCI;
> >> @@ -1065,7 +1062,6 @@ static void tegra_pcie_power_off(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> >> dev_err(dev, "failed to power off PHY(s): %d\n", err);
> >> }
> >>
> >> - reset_control_assert(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> >
> > This does not look like it is part of the reset de-assertion code move.
> >
> > tegra_pcie_enable_controller() -> tegra_pcie_enable_ports()
> >
> > in other words, why are you removing it ?
> >
> > Lorenzo
>
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> Host driver should start LTSSM after programming all controller registers.
> In tegra_pcie_enable_controller() bunch of AFI module programming is done and
> I am adding PCIe register programming in this series.
> So I moved deasserting of pcie_xrst(which starts LTSSM) to tegra_pcie_enable_ports(),
> which is right after sending RST pulse(tegra_pcie_port_reset()) to endpoint.
I asked why you removed the reset assertion in tegra_pcie_power_off(),
it is not clear to me. You still call tegra_pcie_power_off() in
the tegra_pcie_probe() error path and I see no reason why the reset
assertion - called through:
tegra_pcie_put_resources()
-> tegra_pcie_power_of()
is removed, if it was needed previously.
Lorenzo
> >> reset_control_assert(pcie->afi_rst);
> >> reset_control_assert(pcie->pex_rst);
> >>
> >> @@ -2116,7 +2112,12 @@ static void tegra_pcie_enable_ports(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> >> port->index, port->lanes);
> >>
> >> tegra_pcie_port_enable(port);
> >> + }
> >>
> >> + /* take the PCIe interface module out of reset */
> >> + reset_control_deassert(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> >> +
> >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(port, tmp, &pcie->ports, list) {
> >> if (tegra_pcie_port_check_link(port))
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.1.4
> >>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
