Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Mark APB clock as critical

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05.12.2017 12:06, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 03:47:32PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 01.12.2017 11:48, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 04:39:22PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 30/11/17 13:24, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> On 30.11.2017 14:31, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 29/11/17 23:13, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>>>> On 30.11.2017 01:55, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've asked you to re-test Tegra114/124 or whatever was failing for you with the
>>>>>>> PLL_M being marked as critical instead of PCLK. Maybe it was PLL_M that actually
>>>>>>> caused trouble on Tegra114/124.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please share the exact change you would like me to test and I will.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please try this:
>>>>
>>>> I tried the patch, but this does not work for Tegra124 it still hangs.
>>>> Tracing the clk calls the last thing I see is ...
>>>>
>>>> [    2.687846] tegra124-dfll 70110000.clock: couldn't get vdd_cpu regulator
>>>> [    2.694403] clk_prepare: hclk_div
>>>> [    2.695929] clk_prepare_complete: hclk_div
>>>> [    2.700027] clk_prepare: hclk
>>>> [    2.702947] clk_prepare_complete: hclk
>>>> [    2.706673] clk_prepare: pclk_div
>>>> [    2.709986] clk_prepare_complete: pclk_div
>>>> [    2.714039] clk_prepare: pclk
>>>> [    2.716985] clk_prepare_complete: pclk
>>>> [    2.720739] clk_prepare: apbdma
>>>> [    2.723833] clk_prepare_complete: apbdma
>>>> [    2.727736] clk_enable: hclk_div
>>>> [    2.730940] clk_enable_complete: hclk_div
>>>> [    2.734926] clk_enable: hclk
>>>> [    2.737788] clk_enable_complete: hclk
>>>> [    2.741426] clk_enable: pclk_div
>>>> [    2.744633] clk_enable_complete: pclk_div
>>>> [    2.748619] clk_enable: pclk
>>>> [    2.751481] clk_enable_complete: pclk
>>>> [    2.755120] clk_enable: apbdma
>>>> [    2.758153] clk_enable_complete: apbdma
>>>> [    2.762390] clk_disable: apbdma
>>>> [    2.765088] clk_disable_complete: apbdma
>>>> [    2.768986] clk
>>>>
>>>> So I believe this change is correct and that Peter's analysis on IRC
>>>> seems correct, that this change has exposed another issue with the clock
>>>> driver.
>>>>
>>>> Peter, can you summarise which other clocks should be made critical?
>>>
>>> The following clocks should be critical:
>>>
>>> pclk
>>> hclk
>>> sclk
>>> emc
>>> mc
>>> pll_p
>>>
>>> I think that's it.
>>
>> Could you please elaborate why pll_p should be critical? Is it applicable to all
>> Tegra generations?
> 
> There are quite many clocks relying on pll_p as their source. In theory we
> might get away with making sure all thsoe clocks are critical if needed, but
> it's usually easier to just make sure we never turn off pll_p. We should
> certainly never try to change the rate of pll_p. Obviously also osc and clk32k
> should never be turned off during runtime, but there is no hw which allows you
> to do this.
Okay, I see it is explicitly documented in TRM that "modules take in an
additional fix PLL clock source for a portion of their logic" and indeed most of
periperals use pll_p and its dividers for the "portion of logic".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux