On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are only 3 differences (not including the name) in the definitions
> of the gic_chip and gic_eoimode1_chip structures. Instead of statically
> defining the gic_eoimode1_chip structure, remove it and populate the
> eoimode1 functions dynamically for the appropriate GIC irqchips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> if (static_key_true(&supports_deactivate) && gic_nr == 0) {
> - gic->chip = gic_eoimode1_chip;
> + gic->chip.irq_mask = gic_eoimode1_mask_irq;
> + gic->chip.irq_eoi = gic_eoimode1_eoi_irq;
> + gic->chip.irq_set_vcpu_affinity = gic_irq_set_vcpu_affinity;
> + gic->chip.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "GICv2");
I think you can just = "GICv2" there. No need to kasprintf()
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
