On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Jon Hunter wrote: > /** > * struct irq_chip - hardware interrupt chip descriptor > * > + * @parent: pointer to associated device That's really a bad name. parent suggests that this is a parent interrupt chip and your explanation sucks as well. What's an associated device? Network card? > #include <linux/irqdesc.h> > #include <linux/kernel_stat.h> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ > # define IRQ_BITMAP_BITS (NR_IRQS + 8196) > diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c > index b2a93a37f772..65878e7c7c82 100644 > --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c > +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c > @@ -1114,6 +1114,10 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new) > if (!try_module_get(desc->owner)) > return -ENODEV; > > + ret = irq_chip_pm_get(&desc->irq_data); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto out_mput; So this call nests inside the chip_bus_lock() region. Is that intentional? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
