On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:48:34PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> Adds generic PM domain support for Tegra SoCs but this series only >>> enables support for it on Tegra 64-bit devices. There is no reason why >>> this cannot be enable for Tegra 32-bit devices, but to keep the patch >>> series to a minimum only 64-bit devices are enabled so far. >>> >>> This series has been boot tested on Tegra210 as well as various 32-bit >>> Tegra platforms. > > [...] > >>> Jon Hunter (10): >>> PM / Domains: Fix removal of a subdomain >>> PM / Domains: Add function to get the last domain added >>> PM / Domains: Add function to remove a pm-domain >> >> Ulf, Kevin, Rafael, >> >> It's too late to take these patches through the Tegra tree for v4.6, but >> if Jon can get the above three patches ready before the merge window, >> would you be willing to pick them up into your trees for v4.6? > > It's a bit late in the cycle, but since one is a fix and the other two > add functions that aren't (yet) used, I think it would be fine to get > them in for v4.6. But, the final decision is with Rafael. > >> Doing so >> might make it easier to deal with the dependencies. The prerequisites >> would already be in Linus' tree when I apply the Tegra bits for v4.7. > > Yeah, makes sense. > >> I don't mind taking all of it through the Tegra tree for v4.7, though. I >> can provide a stable branch with the PM / Domains patches for you to >> pull in, in case there are any conflicts. > > I think it makes the most sense for these prereqs to merge through > linux-pm. Let's see what Rafael thinks about the timing. The timing is fine by me. Do you want me to apply [1-3/10] from this series, then? Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
