Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:48:34PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Adds generic PM domain support for Tegra SoCs but this series only >> enables support for it on Tegra 64-bit devices. There is no reason why >> this cannot be enable for Tegra 32-bit devices, but to keep the patch >> series to a minimum only 64-bit devices are enabled so far. >> >> This series has been boot tested on Tegra210 as well as various 32-bit >> Tegra platforms. [...] >> Jon Hunter (10): >> PM / Domains: Fix removal of a subdomain >> PM / Domains: Add function to get the last domain added >> PM / Domains: Add function to remove a pm-domain > > Ulf, Kevin, Rafael, > > It's too late to take these patches through the Tegra tree for v4.6, but > if Jon can get the above three patches ready before the merge window, > would you be willing to pick them up into your trees for v4.6? It's a bit late in the cycle, but since one is a fix and the other two add functions that aren't (yet) used, I think it would be fine to get them in for v4.6. But, the final decision is with Rafael. > Doing so > might make it easier to deal with the dependencies. The prerequisites > would already be in Linus' tree when I apply the Tegra bits for v4.7. Yeah, makes sense. > I don't mind taking all of it through the Tegra tree for v4.7, though. I > can provide a stable branch with the PM / Domains patches for you to > pull in, in case there are any conflicts. I think it makes the most sense for these prereqs to merge through linux-pm. Let's see what Rafael thinks about the timing. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
