On 11/05/2015 09:03 AM, Alban Bedel wrote:
The BCT size check assume a quiet large image, however if the image
doesn't contains a bootloader it won't be that large. Change the size
check to check for the smallest possible BCT size which is currently
diff --git a/src/cbootimage.h b/src/cbootimage.h
+#define NVBOOT_CONFIG_TABLE_SIZE_MIN 4080
I think a comment is warranted here. This value needs to be (a) small
enough that it isn't larger than the total BCT size on any chip, and (b)
large enough that it includes the bct->boot_data_version field for all
chips. (Hopefully those two constraints can continue to be met with a
single value in the future...)
diff --git a/src/data_layout.c b/src/data_layout.c
@@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ int get_bct_size_from_image(build_image_context *context)
if (!fp)
return -ENODATA;
- if (fread(buffer, 1, NVBOOT_CONFIG_TABLE_SIZE_MAX, fp) != NVBOOT_CONFIG_TABLE_SIZE_MAX) {
+ if (fread(buffer, 1, NVBOOT_CONFIG_TABLE_SIZE_MAX, fp) < NVBOOT_CONFIG_TABLE_SIZE_MIN) {
Can you please also update the size of buffer[]:
int get_bct_size_from_image(build_image_context *context)
{
u_int8_t buffer[NVBOOT_CONFIG_TABLE_SIZE_MAX];
I wonder if it's worth updating all SoCs' versions of
if_bct_is_tNNN_get_soc_config() so that they validate that the end
offset of bct->boot_data_version is < NVBOOT_CONFIG_TABLE_SIZE_MIN, or
perhaps that the offset is < context->bct_size, in which case
get_bct_size_from_image() would need to be enhanced to set/clear that
value when setting/clearing context->bct?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
