On Mon, 02 Nov 2015, Martyn Welch wrote: > On 02/11/15 12:47, Lee Jones wrote: > >On Mon, 02 Nov 2015, Martyn Welch wrote: > > > >>From: Martyn Welch <martyn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>This is my initial attempt to get xusb working without being a MFD on the > >>latest upstream kernel. It's still a bit hacky in places, but does seem to > >>get the USB2 up and working (USB3 device is recognised as a USB3 device > >>rather than enumberating as a USB2 device). > >After my 20 second look at the 2 patches of this set you sent me, I've > >concluded that it looks barking mad. In patch 2 you're adding the > >XUSB MFD driver, then in this patch you're telling us that you're > >moving away from MFD despite adding more code to the subsystem. > > Hi Lee, > > Sorry, seems git send-email added you of it's own volition. > > I've sent these patches to the mailing list for comment/help not for > submission. As mentioned in the cover email, the first 5 patches are > from an existing series that has been rejected. The later 3 patches > show my modifications. I have not yet moved these files from the MFD > directory, but will before submission (the series will be reworked > so that the driver never goes into the MFD area). Okay, very well. > >Besides, I'm never applying a patch that self confesses to be "hacky > >in places" into Mainline, ever. > > As I mentioned before, I'm posting these patches for comment (hence > why I've marked them as "RFC" not "PATCH"). I did notice that this was an RFC -- and this was my Comment. ;) -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
