Re: [RFC 9/9] dts: tegra: WIP: hack dts to test new dt flags for i2c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > +
>> > +           eeprom@42 {
>> > +                   compatible = "linux,slave-24c02";
>> > +                   //FIXME: Should be I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS | 0x42
>> > +                   reg = <0xc0000042>;
>>
>> The node name doesn't match the reg property anymore. Isn't that considered as
>> a problem ?
>
> Hmm, true. So far, Rob (CCed) was fine with this approach:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-tegra/msg22760.html
>
> @Rob: If we introduce flag bits in the MSBs of an I2C address, the reg
> property is different from the node name. Is this a problem?

No, I don't it is a problem.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux