Re: [RFC 9/9] dts: tegra: WIP: hack dts to test new dt flags for i2c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > +
> > +		eeprom@42 {
> > +			compatible = "linux,slave-24c02";
> > +			//FIXME: Should be I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS | 0x42
> > +			reg = <0xc0000042>;
> 
> The node name doesn't match the reg property anymore. Isn't that considered as 
> a problem ?

Hmm, true. So far, Rob (CCed) was fine with this approach:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-tegra/msg22760.html

@Rob: If we introduce flag bits in the MSBs of an I2C address, the reg
property is different from the node name. Is this a problem?

Thanks,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux