On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:08:19 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove > > > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel(). > > > > This doesn't apply, please check and resend. > > > This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14 > > and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they > > depend on other changes in the PWM framework). > > I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus' > > 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them > > on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea. > > What is the dependency for the enable patch? Oh, indeed. This patch has no dependency on the PWM changes. I'll send it on its own then. Thanks, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
