Re: [RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove
> > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel().

> > This doesn't apply, please check and resend.

> This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14
> and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they
> depend on other changes in the PWM framework).
> I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus'
> 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them
> on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea.

What is the dependency for the enable patch?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux