> -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandre Courbot [mailto:gnurou@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 11:30 PM > To: David Ung; thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: airlied@xxxxxxxx; linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Arto Merilainen; Terje Bergstrom > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] gpu: host1x: Reduce host1x job allocation size > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:39 AM, David Ung <davidu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Alexandre Courbot [mailto:gnurou@xxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 12:09 AM > >> To: David Ung > >> Cc: airlied@xxxxxxxx; linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx; swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Arto Merilainen; > >> Terje Bergstrom > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] gpu: host1x: Reduce host1x job allocation > >> size > >> > >> The series looks ok to me, the only problem I see is that we are > >> lacking means to thoroughly test host1x patches across all the > >> supported Tegra chips. > >> > >> Could you detail what kind of testing this patch series has > >> undergone, and which chips/boards have been tested? > > > > Tested the host1x channel tests for T132 on A44. > > Also ran Paul's EIMT set up which only tests booting kernel to console > > for T20/T30/T114/T124 and QEMU > > Thierry, what do you think? > > I know we are lacking proper testing infrastructure for host1x, but these > patches really looks harmless to me. Thank you Alex for the review. It would be good to have closure to this patchset. Thierry ping? ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��נ���^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
