Thierry, I did the following test. It works for me. jimmyz@jimmzhang-P9X79:~/laguna/fastboot/github/cbootimage$ src/cbootimage -s tegra210 -gbct board-foster-ffd-spi.cfg board-foster-ffd-spi.bct New BCT file board-foster-ffd-spi.bct has been successfully generated! jimmyz@jimmzhang-P9X79:~/laguna/fastboot/github/cbootimage$ src/bct_dump board-foster-ffd-spi.bct -Jimmy ________________________________________ From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 2:19 PM To: Thierry Reding; Jimmy Zhang Cc: Allen Martin; Stephen Warren; linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [cbootimage PATCH v3 0/3] Add support for Tegra210 On 03/23/2015 03:13 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:26:10PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 03/20/2015 06:20 PM, Jimmy Zhang wrote: >>> Four t210 specific supporting files are added under src/t210 diretory. >>> Comparing T210 bct to T132 bct, the main changes include the size increased >>> to 10240 from 8704. The number of boot devices that can be specified in bct >>> is reduced from 4 to 1. And many new fileds are added to nvboot_sdram_params. >>> >>> v1: Initial changes >>> v2: Fix some minor issues found in v1 >>> Removed files src/t210/nvboot_config.h and src/t210/sdram_param.h >>> that were added unintentionally in v1. >>> v3: Remove "deprecated" from help -t option help text. >> >> I think this version looks fine. Barring any objections, I'll apply it Tue >> my time sometime. > > I wasn't able to successfully dump a BCT using this series. I'm not sure > if that's actually caused by a bad BCT or by the patches not being > correct. Do we have canonical BCT sources somewhere for something like > Foster? > > The problem I'm seeing is that bct_dump reports that the BCT contains 0 > SDRAM sets, whereas I'm pretty sure I've used the same BCT to bootstrap > a device with tegrarcm, so it's got to have valid SDRAM sets defined. I > can dig deeper, but it'd be good to have a reference BCT source and > image to verify that converting to BCT and back to source actually is an > idempotent operation. OK, I'll hold off applying this until you've been able to use it successfully. I did check that the patches compiled, and that tegra-uboot-flasher was able to build flash images for all existing boards, but didn't attempt to use the new SoC support.
Attachment:
board-foster-ffd-spi.cfg
Description: board-foster-ffd-spi.cfg
Attachment:
board-foster-ffd-spi.bct
Description: board-foster-ffd-spi.bct
