On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:26:10PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/20/2015 06:20 PM, Jimmy Zhang wrote: > >Four t210 specific supporting files are added under src/t210 diretory. > >Comparing T210 bct to T132 bct, the main changes include the size increased > >to 10240 from 8704. The number of boot devices that can be specified in bct > >is reduced from 4 to 1. And many new fileds are added to nvboot_sdram_params. > > > >v1: Initial changes > >v2: Fix some minor issues found in v1 > > Removed files src/t210/nvboot_config.h and src/t210/sdram_param.h > > that were added unintentionally in v1. > >v3: Remove "deprecated" from help -t option help text. > > I think this version looks fine. Barring any objections, I'll apply it Tue > my time sometime. I wasn't able to successfully dump a BCT using this series. I'm not sure if that's actually caused by a bad BCT or by the patches not being correct. Do we have canonical BCT sources somewhere for something like Foster? The problem I'm seeing is that bct_dump reports that the BCT contains 0 SDRAM sets, whereas I'm pretty sure I've used the same BCT to bootstrap a device with tegrarcm, so it's got to have valid SDRAM sets defined. I can dig deeper, but it'd be good to have a reference BCT source and image to verify that converting to BCT and back to source actually is an idempotent operation. Thierry
Attachment:
pgppVouOv4AwH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
