Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] mfd: cros_ec: Sync to the latest cros_ec_commands.h from EC sources

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 09:46 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > From: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This just updates include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h to match the
> > latest EC version (which is the One True Source for such things).  See
> > <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/ec>
> > 
> > [dianders: took today's ToT version from the Chromium OS EC; deleted
> > references to cros_ec_dev and cros_ec_lpc since those aren't upstream
> > yet]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3: None
> > Changes in v2: None
> > 
> >  drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c                |    2 +-
> >  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h          |    4 +-
> >  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h | 1128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  3 files changed, 1059 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> 
> Applied, thanks.

This patch is included in linux-next since next-20140521. I'm not sure
why I waited three weeks before sending this question...

> > [...]
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
> > index 86fd069..7853a64 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h
>> [...]
> > @@ -1206,14 +1865,231 @@ struct ec_params_force_idle {
> > [...]
> > +/*
> > + * Known param numbers are defined here. Ranges are reserved for board-specific
> > + * params, which are handled by the particular implementations.
> > + */
> > +enum charge_state_params {
> > +	CS_PARAM_CHG_VOLTAGE,	      /* charger voltage limit */
> > +	CS_PARAM_CHG_CURRENT,	      /* charger current limit */
> > +	CS_PARAM_CHG_INPUT_CURRENT,   /* charger input current limit */
> > +	CS_PARAM_CHG_STATUS,	      /* charger-specific status */
> > +	CS_PARAM_CHG_OPTION,	      /* charger-specific options */
> > +	/* How many so far? */
> > +	CS_NUM_BASE_PARAMS,
> > +
> > +	/* Range for CONFIG_CHARGER_PROFILE_OVERRIDE params */

CONFIG_CHARGER_PROFILE_OVERRIDE doesn't match anything in linux-next. Is
a Kconfig symbol CHARGER_PROFILE_OVERRIDE perhaps queued somewhere?

> > +	CS_PARAM_CUSTOM_PROFILE_MIN = 0x10000,
> > +	CS_PARAM_CUSTOM_PROFILE_MAX = 0x1ffff,
> > +

I guess so, because these two constants aren't used anywhere.

> > +	/* Other custom param ranges go here... */
> > +};
> > [...]

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux