> >> > >> Mike, others, > >> > >> Any objections to this idea? If there's not much opposition, then maybe > >> Peter can actually spend time fixing and testing this patch? > > > > Idea seems fine. I had actually considered removing the hiearchal > > directory structure completely with the advent of clk_dump and > > clk_summary, but if there is value in the flattened directory structure > > then I'm all for it. > I think the additional value of the flattened directory probably comes > from internal tree patches that would add set rate capability to clocks, > etc that would be helpful with testing. > Yes. Eg. I posted a patch to dump a clocks registers for Tegra. > Agree with all the comments so far. > > Peter, > > Looks like there's some support and no opposition so far. So do you want > to send out a real patch that's been tested and with the comments above > taken care of? Yes. I will do that. Cheers, Peter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
