Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: rename 'phy' field of 'struct usb_hcd' to 'transceiver'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/09/2014 08:48 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

Return to the 'phy' field of 'struct usb_hcd' its historic name
'transceiver'.
This is in preparation to adding the generic PHY support.

Surely if the correct term is transceiver, we should be adding generic
transceiver support not generic PHY support? To be honest, this rename
feels like churn, especially since the APIs and DT bindings all still
include the work phy so now everything will be inconsistent.

    How about 'usb_phy'?

That certainly would make things more consistent, but I wonder why
"usb_phy" is better than "phy" when the code/struct in question is
something USB-specific; the "usb_" prefix seems implicit to me due to
context.

I tend to agree. However, I need to name the new field of stype 'struct phy *' somehow... perhaps something like 'gen_phy' for it would do?

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux