Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: rename 'phy' field of 'struct usb_hcd' to 'transceiver'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/09/2014 10:27 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 04/09/2014 07:31 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> 
>>> Return to the 'phy' field of 'struct usb_hcd' its historic name
>>> 'transceiver'.
>>> This is in preparation to adding the generic PHY support.
> 
>> Surely if the correct term is transceiver, we should be adding generic
>> transceiver support not generic PHY support? To be honest, this rename
>> feels like churn, especially since the APIs and DT bindings all still
>> include the work phy so now everything will be inconsistent.
> 
>    How about 'usb_phy'?

That certainly would make things more consistent, but I wonder why
"usb_phy" is better than "phy" when the code/struct in question is
something USB-specific; the "usb_" prefix seems implicit to me due to
context.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux