On 02/26/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/24/2014 07:13 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On 02/25/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/24/2014 03:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Add a device tree for NVIDIA SHIELD. The set of enabled features is
still minimal with no display option (although HDMI should be easy
to get to work) and USB requiring external power.
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-roth.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-roth.dts
+ memory {
+ reg = <0x80000000 0x79600000>;
It might be worth a comment here pointing out that the rest of RAM is
reserved for some carveouts/..., or at least that these values are set
this way in order to match what the bootloader usually passes to
downstream kernels in the command-line?
Yes, absolutely right. On a more general note I feel like DTs could gain
clarity if they had more comments (e.g. for pinmuxing which are a quite
heavy block otherwise), do you have any objection to this? (I guess not,
but so far the rule seems to be "no comment in DT" :P )
I have no objection in particular. Specifically for pinmux, the values
seem pretty obvious, so I'm not sure what extra the comment could
convey, but I'll take a look at any proposed patch:-)
It would just make grouping of related pins according more visible than
having to look at the "nvidia,function" property currently does - just a
little added comfort.
+ /* Wifi */
+ sdhci@78000000 {
+ status = "okay";
+ bus-width = <4>;
+ broken-cd;
+ keep-power-in-suspend;
+ cap-sdio-irq;
Is non-removable better than broken-cd, or are they entirely unrelated?
They are unrelated actually. With non-removable the driver expects the
device to always be there since boot, and does not check for the card to
be removed/added after boot. broken-cd indicates there is no CD line and
the device should be polled regularly.
It doesn't sound like that's what we want either; we should know exactly
when the device is added/removed, based on when the relevant
clocks/supplies/... are turned on/off.
Yes, I guess this will require a proper DT binding like what Arend proposed.
For the Wifi chip, non-removable would be the correct setting
hardware-wise, but there is a trap: the chip has its reset line asserted
at boot-time, and you need to set GPIO 229 to de-assert it. Only after
that will the device be detected on the SDIO bus. Since it lacks a CD
line, it must be polled, hence the broken-cd property.
How does that GPIO get manipulated right now? I assume you must be
manually configuring it via sysfs after boot or something? If so,
perhaps it's best to just leave out the WiFi node until it works
automatically.
The GPIO needs to be set from user-space, yes. But if we leave the Wifi
node out, I'm concerned that wireless will not be usable at all,
wouldn't it?
This also raises another, redundant problem with DT bindings: AFAIK we
currently have no way to let the system know the device will only appear
after a given GPIO is set. It would also be nice to be able to give some
parameters to the Wifi driver through the DT (like the OOB interrupt).
Right now the Wifi chip is brought up by exporting the GPIO and writing
to it from user-space, and the OOB interrupt is not used.
There was a thread on this topic on LAKML recently. I didn't really
follow it, so I don't know if there was a useful resolution. I think it
was "mmc: add support for power-on sequencing through DT", although
there may have been other related threads. It was possibly tangentially
related to power-sequences-in-DT...
...
I'm not sure about cap-sdio-irq, it doesn't seem to make a difference
for SHIELD Wifi.
I'd tend to leave it out then.
I will check whether it helps with the latency issues I have noticed and
remove it if it doesn't.
Thanks,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
