On 10/31/2013 09:41 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:50:03PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 10/30/2013 04:18 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: >>>>> Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and >>>>> Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114. >>>> >>>> Why? What benefit does this give, or what bug does this fix? >>> >>> Otherrwise Tegra114 will crash on boot. >> >> Sigh. For what reason? > > pll_re_vco having an unsupported rate of 300Mhz. My guess is that it depends > on the bootloader if you will see this. I'm fairly sure I verified this on > my dalmore in helsinki and it worked, but it failed on Paul's test setup. OK, so this is primarily a SW issue, because pll_e's freq_table simply doesn't have an entry for input frequency 300MHz. Can you make sure the commit description explains that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
