On 09/23/2013 08:24 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > This patchset introduces common infrastructure for clocks which exist in > several Tegra SoCs. We also move Tegra114 to this new infrastructure. > Tegra20 and Tegra30 will be moved later in separate patchsets. > > Changes since v1: > + move common clks allocation to patch 2 > + adapt also Tegra20 and Tegra30 to the changes in patch 2 > > Boottested on dalmore, beaverboard and seaboard. What commit is this series based on? I applied the two pre-requisites: ARM: tegra114: add missing clocks to binding.eml clk: tegra: replace enum tegra114_clk by binding header.eml ... but still got a bunch of conflicts when applying this. I guess at least commit 819c1de "clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag" isn't in the history of this series. Consequently, I gave up and didn't test this. Also, I had given a lot of feedback on v1. Admittedly I should have reviewed v2 since it appeared just before I reviewed v1, but I expect most of the feedback still applies given the limited list of changes listed above. Certainly, this series still removes the "dsib" clock yet I expect it shouldn't (patch 1, in the change to tegra114_periph_clk_init()), and that's the very first piece of feedback I gave on v1, and also causes the first "git am" conflict with CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
