On 08/19/2013 08:53 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 06:58:03PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/07/2013 05:25 AM, Mark Zhang wrote:
>>> From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> COP is a reset only clock. So this patch adds NO_CLK support
>>> then adds the COP clock.
>>
>> Do we actually need this clock upstream yet?
>>
>> IIRC, Prashant was working on implementing the common reset API, so I'd
>> prefer not to add any reset-only "clocks" to the clock driver, but
>> rather to simply make sure that the new reset driver exposes them.
>>
>
> It would be better if we can switch to the reset API.
>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c
>>
>>> enum tegra114_clk {
>>> - rtc = 4, timer = 5, uarta = 6, sdmmc2 = 9, i2s1 = 11, i2c1 = 12,
>>> + cop = 1, rtc = 4, timer = 5, uarta = 6, sdmmc2 = 9, i2s1 = 11, i2c1 = 12,
>>
>> To make this change, you would also need to edit
>> include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra114-car.h. BTW, why doesn't the Tegra
>> clock driver include that file rather than defining its own enum?
>
> History. include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra114-car.h didn't exist when
> clk-tegra114.c was written.
Right, but then someone created tegra114-car.h, but didn't bother to
follow through and update the clock driver:-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
