On 08/08/2013 02:36 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 08/08/2013 10:56 AM, Wei Ni wrote:
>
>> Enable thermal sensor nct1008 for t114 dalmore.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts | 10 +++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts
>> index b5a42f0..9d4d2b2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts
>> @@ -738,6 +738,14 @@
>> realtek,ldo1-en-gpios =
>> <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(V, 3) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> };
>> +
>> + nct1008 {
>
> ePAPR [1] says: "the name of a node should be somewhat generic,
> reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming
> model". So I suggest "thermal"
True, although there's quite some precedent for node-names being the
chip name for external chips in existing DTs. If we change this node
name, I'd like to see a patch that makes all the other "nct1008" nodes
match the new name...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
