On 07/09/2013 03:55 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:48:40 +0800, Wei Ni wrote: >> On 07/09/2013 02:21 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> It should work out of the box. As a matter of fact the same chip is used >>> on Tamonten and the DTS files use "onnn,nct1008". That used to work. If >>> it no longer does then that's a regression. >> >> I synced the linux-next from: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git >> and use the tag v3.10-rc7, but in the lm90.c it doesn't have DT support, >> such as "onnn,nct1008". >> I googled it and found there has patch: >> [PATCH] hwmon: (lm90) Add device tree support , which is in: >> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2013-February/038099.html >> , but it didn't be merged into the linux-next. > > It was not, because of the next reply in the same thread: > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2013-February/038100.html > >> which git repository and branch should I use ? > > It is supposed to just work. What doesn't work for you exactly? > Oh, yes, the "onnn,nct1008" can work. I read the i2c driver and the of_i2c.c carefully, I understand why the lm90 can be loaded by setting "onnn,nct1008". Indeed, we can set the vendor string to anything, even "xxx,nct1008", the lm90 also can be loaded correctly. Anyway, I will use the "onnn,nct1008" in my next version. Thanks for your comments. Wei. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
