On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 17:47 +0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 01 June 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 05/31/2013 04:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Monday 20 May 2013, Joseph Lo wrote: > > >> + cpu_to_csr_req r1, r0 > > >> + mov32 r2, TEGRA_FLOW_CTRL_BASE > > >> + ldr r1, [r2, r1] > > > > > > This causes build errors now, since cpu_to_csr_req is not defined anywhere. > > > > What build error are you seeing? I built next-20130531 earlier today > > without any issue. > > > > I do remember making a similar comment during review of this patch that > > cpu_to_csr_req wasn't defined anywhere, but IIRC Joseph pointed me to > > another patch in the series which had added it, or something like that. > > Sorry, I should have mentioned it was using randconfig, all the defconfig > builds work fine. The code is inside of "#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC", > but Tegra2 is normally enabled in defconfig, so it does not get built. > > I suspect the #ifdef is wrong as well, and should have been "if tegra3 > or tegra4" instead. Joseph, can you clarify the intent of this? > > Arnd Arnd, I think the "ifdef" should be removed here because we had a runtime Tegra SoC detection code here, the "ifdef" here would cause the code won't be built for the tegra_defconfig that we are using. And a typo need to fix here, it should be "cpu_to_csr_reg" not "cpu_to_csr_req". Sorry. Thanks for report. Will provide a fix. Joseph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html