On 05/12/2013 02:26 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > Change tegra_emc_ramcode_devnode() to get ram-code from child node instead of > parent. I've applied this to Tegra's for-3.11/soc branch. > For me it looks like it should be better to place ram-code inside of table > nodes, so num_tables will be incremented if table has valid ram-code and table > with invalid ram-code will be skipped on getting table params loop. This avoids > placing of #address-cells and #size-cells in nodes with ram-code. > If it looks ok, I may send new patch. That would be a change to the DT binding. DT bindings are supposed to be a stable ABI, so we wouldn't want to change the binding unless there was a strong reason. I don't think there is one here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
