Change tegra_emc_ramcode_devnode() to get ram-code from child node instead of
parent.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
---
For me it looks like it should be better to place ram-code inside of table
nodes, so num_tables will be incremented if table has valid ram-code and table
with invalid ram-code will be skipped on getting table params loop. This avoids
placing of #address-cells and #size-cells in nodes with ram-code.
If it looks ok, I may send new patch.
arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra2_emc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra2_emc.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra2_emc.c
index 9e8bdfa..25f0189 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra2_emc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra2_emc.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static struct device_node *tegra_emc_ramcode_devnode(struct device_node *np)
u32 reg;
for_each_child_of_node(np, iter) {
- if (of_property_read_u32(np, "nvidia,ram-code", ®))
+ if (of_property_read_u32(iter, "nvidia,ram-code", ®))
continue;
if (reg == tegra_bct_strapping)
return of_node_get(iter);
--
1.8.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
